[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Changes to MLD to support Anycast



>> - node with anycast address(*) participating routing exchange
>>         pros: deployable now, routing protocol has mechanisms for
>>                 protecting against malicious route injection (sometimes
>>                 they are just "use IPsec"...)
>>         cons: some hates it when the node is a host
>And how does a host, on the same link with the anycast-capable node,
>know to find that node locally?  Do we have to accept triangular
>routing from host to router to anycast-capable node?

	if the /64 prefix for the anycast address is the same as one used on
	the subnet, normal ND works just fine.  otherwise, icmp6 redirect will
	take care of it.  so there's no issue.

itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------