[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A use for site local addresses?

To: Naiming Shen <naiming@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A use for site local addresses?
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:55:30 -0500
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>, Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxxxx>, alh-ietf@xxxxxxxx, "'Kurt Erik Lindqvist'" <kurtis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'EricLKlein'" <eric@xxxxxxx>, ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:00:51 +0200
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
In-reply-to: <20030327080114.E7B9680F0C3@prattle.redback.com>
Sender: owner-ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


> i know of some companies employee can be fired by surfing the
> Internet during work hours. i would think those employee love to
> have private addresses on their workstations and no NAT devices at
> all, just in case they don't "accidentally" get fired.

so we should cripple the v6 architecture just so some brain-dead 
company can't be bothered to block port 80?

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------

References:
- Re: A use for site local addresses?
  - From: Naiming Shen

Prev by Date: Re: A use for site local addresses?
Next by Date: Internetworking 2003: Call for Papers
Previous by thread: RE: A use for site local addresses?
Next by thread: Re: A use for site local addresses?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread