[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Requirements for Limited-Scope Unicast Addressing in IPv6

% Bill,
% > Bill Manning wrote:
% > what an odd point of view.  if, as is asserted, the
% > IPv6 is "production" then why are we still seeing
% > drafts changing the address format?
% You are making my point. I am not the one that states that v6 is
% operational, BTW.
% http://ops.ietf.org/lists/v6ops/v6ops.2002/msg00000.html
% Michel.

	ah.. perhaps my  issue is that your original note
	used the term "production", while now you use the
	term "operational".  they are different words w/
	distinct meanings.

Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com