[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is 2001:250:5400:: a valid IPv6 address?

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Liusand wrote:
>   I failed to configure it as a gateway for 2000::/3 route on both
> usagi-linux24-stable-20030214 and usagi-linux24-s20030609, the command,
> "ip -6 route add 2000::/3 via 2001:250:5400:: dev eth0"  reported
> "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument". But I made it the "default"
> gateway easily on both Linux 2.4.18 kernel and Red Hat 2.4.20-8 kernel.

You're running your system as a router, and 2001:250:5400:: (subnet router
anycast address) points to the loopback, I suspect.

But in any case, this is not the right place to ask such questions.  
Use USAGI mailing lists.

Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com