Re: state-of-art SLs

[Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> The chairs have read all of the messages on the list, and based on your 
> considerable input, we have determined that the IPv6 WG does have rough 
> consensus to deprecate the usage of IPv6 site-local unicast addressing AND 
> to investigate alternative mechanisms for local addressing and local access 
. control.

humm - it is not all that often that we have said that 2/3 is rough 
consensus in the IETF - in my exterience if 1/3 is not in support
then I would not claim consensus (even 6 grit) - 3/4 would be very
rough indeed, 5/6 would be the mininum I would say was "rough consensus"

just when does "rough consensus" faid out in this model?

Scott

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------