[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing

Subject: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 08:50:04 +0200
Cc: Bob Hinden <hinden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 10:33:36 +0300
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
In-reply-to: <83D03241-C6F7-11D7-A834-000A959CF516@cisco.com>
References: <83D03241-C6F7-11D7-A834-000A959CF516@cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Patrik Fältström wrote:

> From an Application (above TCP) perspective, A, definitely A. Itojun 
> summarizes well the issues. Mandating a host to know topology is just 
> a really bad thing. Really really bad.
>
I concur with an added "really" tagged on.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------

References:
- Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
  - From: Patrik Fältström

Prev by Date: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
Next by Date: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
Previous by thread: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
Next by thread: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread