[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing

To: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:56:36 -0400
Cc: moore@xxxxxxxxxx, hinden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 22:38:06 +0300
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
In-reply-to: <20030805150754.GA10754@fysh.org>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030804102842.0331d820@mailhost.iprg.nokia.com><20030805150754.GA10754@fysh.org>
Sender: owner-ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>  We already have alternatives
> to site-local addresses: 6to4 addresses based on PI or RFC1918
> IPv4 addresses. 

6to4 addresses based on RFC 1918 addresses should be forbidden.
IMHO, this is an oversight in the 6to4 RFC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- local addresses, 6to4 and 2002:RFC1918 [Re: Moving forward onSite-Local and Local Addressing]
  - From: Pekka Savola

References:
- Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
  - From: Bob Hinden
- Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
  - From: Zefram

Prev by Date: Re: What to do with FEC0? [was Re: Moving forward on Site-Local andLocal Addressing
Next by Date: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
Previous by thread: Re: Site-Local and Local Addressing -- "Replacement" Choices
Next by thread: local addresses, 6to4 and 2002:RFC1918 [Re: Moving forward onSite-Local and Local Addressing]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread