[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: state-of-art SLs

To: Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: state-of-art SLs
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 16:31:49 -0400
Cc: moore@xxxxxxxxxx, Erik.Nordmark@xxxxxxx, ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:13:05 +0300
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
In-reply-to: <200307281911.h6SJB15T003911@newdev.harvard.edu>
References: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1059396655.12753.nordmark@bebop.france><200307281911.h6SJB15T003911@newdev.harvard.edu>
Sender: owner-ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> humm - it is not all that often that we have said that 2/3 is rough 
> consensus in the IETF

note that the plurality was 3/4 not 2/3. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Enough Already
  - From: Hans Kruse

References:
- Re: state-of-art SLs
  - From: Erik Nordmark
- Re: state-of-art SLs
  - From: Scott Bradner

Prev by Date: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
Next by Date: Re: state-of-art SLs
Previous by thread: Re: state-of-art SLs
Next by thread: Enough Already
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread