[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Enough Already

To: Hans Kruse <kruse@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Enough Already
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 10:53:31 -0400
Cc: moore@xxxxxxxxxx, ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 18:34:14 +0300
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
In-reply-to: <82915093.1060164914@hkruse2003a>
References: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1059396655.12753.nordmark@bebop.france><200307281911.h6SJB15T003911@newdev.harvard.edu><20030805163149.2cec1dbe.moore@cs.utk.edu><82915093.1060164914@hkruse2003a>
Sender: owner-ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> None of this is helping.  I respectfully disagree with this point of
> view. Further, in the universe I happen to be in, even 3/4 is at best
> "rough" consensus --- lets stop screaming and figure out a compromise.

IMHO, 3/4 is a strong consensus given the number of people participating
in that opinion.

Nobody is screaming.  However some people are behaving unreasonably.

Keith
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------

References:
- Re: state-of-art SLs
  - From: Erik Nordmark
- Re: state-of-art SLs
  - From: Scott Bradner
- Re: state-of-art SLs
  - From: Keith Moore
- Enough Already
  - From: Hans Kruse

Prev by Date: Unicast scope field (was: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing)
Next by Date: Re: Independence of Deprecation (Was: Re: Moving forward onSite-Local and Local Addressing)
Previous by thread: Enough Already
Next by thread: Re: state-of-art SLs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread