RE: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@xxxxxx>]

Exactly.  SLs are dead maybe the only alternative is A.
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Erik Gullerud [mailto:lerik@nolink.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:03 AM
> To: Bob Hinden
> Cc: ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> Subject: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 20:06, Bob Hinden wrote:
> 
> > I would like to hear from the working group on how we 
> should proceed.  
> > I
> > think the choices are:
> 
> I'd like to see A happen. Going for B, and even worse C, will 
> just prolong the current state of uncertainty where a lot of 
> people have heard that site-locals might be deprecated, but 
> are uncertain as to whether they need to concern themselves 
> with support for them or not in ongoing development etc.
> 
> Let's just get rid of the darn things and move on - please.
> 
> /leg
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------