[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: inevitability of PI = 3

To: "Christian Huitema" <huitema@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: inevitability of PI = 3
From: Michael Thomas <mat@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "Michael Thomas" <mat@xxxxxxxxx>, "Keith Moore" <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ftemplin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <alh-ietf@xxxxxxxx>, <leifj@xxxxxxxx>, <awhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 01:01:31 +0300
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
In-reply-to: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA04A2D7C7@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA04A2D7C7@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Sender: owner-ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Christian Huitema writes:
 > Hey, we can legislate whatever...

I'm legally bound to Godwin's Law.

	    Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: inevitability of PI = 3
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- RE: inevitability of PI = 3
  - From: Christian Huitema

Prev by Date: Re: apps people?
Next by Date: Re: inevitability of PI = 3
Previous by thread: RE: inevitability of PI = 3
Next by thread: Re: inevitability of PI = 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread