RE: site-local observations from the outside

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@xxxxxx>]

Valid.  If it goes to RFC status will that make you comfortable?
thanks
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michel Py [mailto:michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us] 
> Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 3:11 PM
> To: Bound, Jim; ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> Subject: RE: site-local observations from the outside
> 
> 
> Jim,
> 
> >>> Jim Bound wrote:
> >>> If we simply say these NEVER leave the site then
> >>> all is fine. Thats the bottom line.
> 
> >> Michel Py wrote.
> >> I'm ok with that. Not only never leave the site but
> >> making >sure that they can't.
> 
> > Even better yes. They "can't".
> 
> You can't guarantee that for the Hinden/Haberman draft, which 
> is the reason I will not use it until we have a solution on a 
> PI-like setup. It's a matter of risk: If I use the 
> Hinden/Haberman draft as private addresses, and if it ends up 
> being perverted as PI, my entire network design goes to the 
> trash. If I hijack a random prefix for private addresses, the 
> risk of collisions although not null is a lot less.
> 
> Michel.
> 
> 
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------