[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: site-local observations from the outside

To: "Jim Bound" <jim.bound@xxxxxx>, <ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: site-local observations from the outside
From: "Michel Py" <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 22:54:13 -0700
Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 09:01:31 +0300
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
Sender: owner-ipng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcNaqKy8S73jKL6FSkGISuIV8kiiawAAHXAgAPVnp6AACsTKsAAPku5wACJLLQAA25s10AAEbUtA
Thread-topic: site-local observations from the outside

Jim,

> Jim Bound wrote:
> Valid.  If it goes to RFC status will that make
> you comfortable?

Nope. The very point I am trying to make is that RFC != enforcement
mechanism.

Michel.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Prev by Date: Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
Next by Date: Re: draft-hain-templin-ipv6-limitedrange-00.txt
Previous by thread: RE: site-local observations from the outside
Next by thread: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread