Re: Moving forward on Site-Local and Local Addressing

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	Jim,


On tisdag, aug 19, 2003, at 02:56 Europe/Stockholm, Bound, Jim wrote:

>> IPv6 IS IPv4 with more bits.
>
> On the contrary it is much more if you go down behind the user and look
> at the protocol and implementation.  It depends on ones view.  I am
> debating this with Geoff now on his Myth article and there will another
> article soon.

In that sense you are probably right. But for the end-user, network 
manager or the Carrier financial department, it's just more bits. There 
are a number of ways that we have changed HOW things are done, but it's 
still the same things.

- kurtis -


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@sunroof.eng.sun.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------