[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 adoption behavior



At 10:15 AM 10/21/2003 -0400, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>>You are wrong :) They tasted the filth of being behind NAT's
>>and not being able to do a number of things including VoIP.
>
>I am no NAT apologist but I do not think this is entirely true. Skype runs
>amazingly well behind NATs. As long as NAT is an option people will find
>ways to twist applications to work with it. It is the application
>developer who feels the pain. Not the end user.

But if I want a VoIP communication from me (behind a NAT) to some user 
behind a NAT, not using a 3rd party "location" server, how does v4 deliver, 
without the receiving user having the pain of port forwarding configuration 
on their NAT?

How do I do the same in v4 where I want end-to-end encryption on the 
application?

Tim

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------