[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration

To: soohong.park@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration
From: itojun@xxxxxxxxxx (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:14:43 +0900 (JST)
Cc: H.Soliman@xxxxxxxxxxx, iljitsch@xxxxxxxxx, ipv6@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:15:27 +0300
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:00:52 +0900"<011f01c39933$659e2270$b7cbdba8@daniel>
List-help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IP Version 6 Working Group (ipv6) <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>,<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>,<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <011f01c39933$659e2270$b7cbdba8@daniel>
Sender: ipv6-admin@xxxxxxxx

> >DHCPv6 allows for DNS configuration in hosts among other things.
> Please don't definitely say that. As I said, RA based DNS discovery
> is work in progress.

	Hesham's statement does not reject RA-based DNS discovery, it
	seems to me.  there's nothing wrong with the above-quoted line.

itojun

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration
  - From: Soohong Daniel Park

References:
- RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration
  - From: Soohong Daniel Park

Prev by Date: Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: MTU handling
Next by Date: Re: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration
Previous by thread: RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration
Next by thread: RE: "RFC 2461bis" issue: DNS configuration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread