RE: Review: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6onbydefault-00.txt

["Chirayu Patel" <chirayu@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

>   If the IPv6 connectivity to those destinations
>   is poor while the IPv4 connectivity is better (i.e., the IPv6 traffic
>   experiences higher latency, lower throughput, or more lost packets
>   than IPv4 traffic), applications will still communicate over IPv6 at
>   the expense of network performance.  There is no information
>   available to applications in this case to advise them to try another
>   destination address.
>
>This is why a good implementation will permit address selection to be
>configured and dynamically too.

FYI, I had proposed dynamic configuration of address selection policy table
using RA's in
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-cpatel-ipv6-automated-policy-table-c
fg-00.txt.

CP






--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------