[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies

On 2004-02-27, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H wrote:
> "Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <sharkey@zoic.org> said:
> >
> > I'm also dubious about relying on votes at IETF meetings for
> > technical issues ... because often an option which seems 'obvious'
> > at the time actually isn't once the drafts have been considered
> > in detail.  And most of the WG attendees won't have considered
> > them in detail before the meeting.  Sad but true.
> (I know this is not a technical discussion, so I'll try to refrain
> myself from making further posting on this particular point.  But feel
> free to respond to this message, of course)

Nah, I'll quit my whinging.

> Let's just recall the recent site-local discussions...

No, please, let's just not! :-)

(If I go suddenly silent on this issue for a while, I'm not
sulking, I'm flying ...)


IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6