[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention



On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Ole Troan wrote:
> I see two alternatives:
> 
>  1. ND proxy. Limited to single router, proxy from uplink to
>     downlink. No need for loop detection.
> 
>  2. Multilink subnet routing. Handles arbitrary topologies. Must
>     handle loops.

You cannot restrict (in protocol) that two boxes would not be 
deployed -- so what is the technical background to option 1)?

Actually that's pretty close to what I'm saying: recommend against 
deploying more than one box (or even forbid it completely), but if the 
user deploys two boxes in any case, this would still work just as long 
as you don't build topologies in which routing loops would exist.
I don't see that happening in the home networks.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------