RE: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols

[Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@xxxxxxx>]

> Well, I for one would rather leave the entire handling of the Managed flag
> to the to-be-written RFC. I see the point of assuming that the flag will be
> visible through some kind of API for the DHCPv6 process, but I would rather
> not build a dependency to another document. 

I'm certainly not implying any API. 
Why do you think the text with the forward reference to "a separate document"
implies any API?

  Erik


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------