[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rfc2462bis] reword "stateful" for other config info?

>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2004 23:08:24 -0400, 
>>>>> "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com> said:

> Your wording works for me well.  Good suggestion too.

Thanks, glad to hear that.  But please let me check one thing: do you
have any preference between the solutions?  That is,

>> 1. remove "stateful" from the definition of the O flag (in
>> rfc2461bis), [...]
>> and reword rfc2462bis accordingly.

or

>> 2. do not touch the definition of the O flag, but add notes for
>> clarification in rfc2462bis like this:
[snip]

I guess you meant solution 2 by "wording", but I'm not really sure.

Thanks,

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------