Re: SEND and unspecified address (was: Re: optimistic dad comments)

[Greg Daley <greg.daley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi James,


James Kempf wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> No need to go over there for comments. :-)
> 
> SEND allows the unspecified address to be used on RSs but the CGA option is
> not included, so, as a practical matter, the signature can't be either since
> the CGA option contains the key.
> 
> A message sent with an unspecified address is not treated as insecure
> however, unlike other ND/RD messages without a CGA option and signature.

Thanks for that, I'll have to read SEND more closely.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------