RE: IPv6 WG Document Status

["Dave Thaler" <dthaler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nothing important was lost, the section just got duplicated.
I will make sure it is fixed before publication.

Thanks,
-Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nimrod Sterrn [mailto:NimrodS@radlan.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 1:43 AM
> To: Dave Thaler
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: IPv6 WG Document Status
> 
> I can see that the draft of tunnel MIB
(draft-ietf-ipv6-inet-tunnel-mib-
> 01.txt) has duplicated
> sections 3.1.3 and 3.1.4. I just hop nothing important was not lost
due to
> this duplication.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Haberman [mailto:brian@innovationslab.net]
> Sent: Fri, July 30, 2004 9:11 PM
> To: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: IPv6 WG Document Status
> 
> 
> All,
>       In order to save time in San Diego, the chairs have once
> again posted the current document status on the web.  We ask
> that WG members review the status and bring up any issues on
> the mailing list.
> 
>
http://www.innovationslab.net/~brian/IETF60/IPv6/IPv6DocumentStatus.html
> 
> Regards,
> Brian & Bob
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------