[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comments on draft-daniel-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-00.txt

>>>>> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:46:22 +0530, 
>>>>> Radhakrishnan Suryanarayanan <rkrishnan.s@samsung.com> said:

>> > An implementation might explore an implementation dependent trick like
>> > combining routers and parameters to mitigate the bad effect of the
>> > admin error.  However, I'd really want to make it outside the scope of
>> > the M/O document.
>> 
>> I agree with this,
>> 
>> In this case, we need to ensure that the router advertisement which
>> we're basing the decision on has the flags set.
>> 
>> It may even be worthwhile explicitly stating that management of
>> flags from multiple routers is not in scope.

> Since the idea of the draft is for BCP/Informational on M&O, we shall as
> well add an
> appendix section to describe handling of the flags from multiple routers.

I don't mind adding the appendix as long we just describe possible
issues (if any) and do NOT try to provide workaround like combining
router/parameters.

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------