[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Stateful != M , Stateless != O



>>>>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:52:45 +1000, 
>>>>> Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au> said:

> I'd like to be sure that's what we're doing though, by
> explicitly stating that in the draft (or at least documenting
> behaviours in such a case).

Same here.  Please refer to the next message of mine
  http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg03353.html
and let's make a consensus.

I showed my own weak preference, but I'm quite open to other ideas.

					JINMEI, Tatuya
					Communication Platform Lab.
					Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
					jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------