[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stateful != M , Stateless != O
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:52:45 +1000,
>>>>> Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au> said:
> I'd like to be sure that's what we're doing though, by
> explicitly stating that in the draft (or at least documenting
> behaviours in such a case).
Same here. Please refer to the next message of mine
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg03353.html
and let's make a consensus.
I showed my own weak preference, but I'm quite open to other ideas.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------