[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ICMPv6: Rate Limiting Configuration Per-Node or Per-Interfaces

To: Mukesh.Gupta@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ICMPv6: Rate Limiting Configuration Per-Node or Per-Interfaces
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:25:32 +0200
Cc: ipv6@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 01:38:53 +0300
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:51:49 CDT.<8D260779A766FB4A9C1739A476F84FA401F79ADB@daebe009.americas.nokia.com>
List-help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>,<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>,<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ipv6-bounces@xxxxxxxx

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   In your opinion (no reasoning please), the rate limiting
   configuration per-interface in the ICMPv6 spec should be a
   
   1) SHOULD
   2) MAY
   3) Any of them is fine for you.
   
=> 2

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

References:
- ICMPv6: Rate Limiting Configuration Per-Node or Per-Interfaces
  - From: Mukesh.Gupta

Prev by Date: Re: comments from Steve Bellovin ondraft-ietf-ipv6-scoping-arch-01.txt
Next by Date: Re: ICMPv6: Rate Limiting Configuration Per-Node or Per-Interfaces
Previous by thread: ICMPv6: Rate Limiting Configuration Per-Node or Per-Interfaces
Next by thread: Re: ICMPv6: Rate Limiting Configuration Per-Node or Per-Interfaces
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread