[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AH and flow label

To: "Soliman, Hesham" <H.Soliman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: AH and flow label
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:12:28 +0200
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ipv6@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:41:17 +0300
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:41:21 EDT.<A11736FE943F1A408F8BBB1B9F5FE8AD394AB1@ftmailserver.flariontech.com>
List-help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>,<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>,<mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ipv6-bounces@xxxxxxxx

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   I agree with Brian. I'd like to see it protected. 
   
=> can you explain what should be the benefits? because today I can see
only one major drawback: gratuitous incompatibility with current
implementations.

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

References:
- RE: AH and flow label
  - From: Soliman, Hesham

Prev by Date: Re: AH and flow label
Next by Date: Re: AH and flow label
Previous by thread: RE: AH and flow label
Next by thread: Re: AH and flow label
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread