[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-05.txt




All,

On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 15:18, Fred Templin wrote:
> It wasn't specified, but the IPv6 layer should have reasonable
> assurance that
> the corruption occurred beyond the end of the header before sending
> ICMPs.
>  

It is hard to imagine the IESG allowing functionality this speculative
to arrive in a specification that is recycling at DS.  And for good
reason.  There is no chance that any functionality like this could get
implementation reports sufficient to qualify for DS within three IETFs
let alone within a couple of days or weeks.

This work doesn't belong in this specification.  It may not belong
anywhere because of the issues cited by Perry.



Tim Hartrick
Mentat Inc.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@xxxxxxxx
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------