Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-08.txt

[sob@xxxxxxxxxxx (Scott Bradner)]

> My point is simply that what we say about DNS should be compatible with
> what we say about routing.

I agree with that

> There are other things we are doing (renumbering procedures, multi6, the
> NAP draft) to try and deflect this danger, but ULAs don't increase it.

we disagree - I think they are an "attractive nuisance" (to use a 
pseudo-legal term) and we (the IETF) will rue the day that we approve
this idea

Scott

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@xxxxxxxx
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------