Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-08.txt

[Bill Manning <bmanning@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 9, 2004, at 5:52, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Bill, this is my last go on this. Not that I specially want
> to leave you the last word, but if you don't get what I'm
> saying after all this, it's pointless to continue. Below...

we agree to disagree.  only history will tell if the IESG is making the 
right choice
here.  as a final - this looks so much like RFC 1918 that it is 
frightening.  esp
when we look at the public query load of these supposedly private 
addresses.
use of views, as common as it is, remains perverse and in contravention 
of the
IAB statement on a common namespace.  So i guess your right, this is 
not the
end2end, common namespace Internet that I thought it was.  This is the 
Internet
of NAT, Walled Gardens, and incoherency....  The market is a powerful 
master.

--bill


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@xxxxxxxx
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------