IPNG thread archive

• Date Index

• Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, (continued)
  • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Pekka Nikander
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Bob Hinden
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Jari Arkko
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Pekka Nikander
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Keith Moore
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Pekka Nikander
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Steve Deering
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Pekka Nikander
    • forward progress reg, Arun
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Pekka Nikander
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Tony Hain
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Jari Arkko
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Tony Hain
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Pekka Nikander
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, James Kempf
    • CGA vs. Zero-conf security (was Re: Using "a bit" as a ....), Pekka Nikander
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Tony Hain
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Erik Nordmark
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Tony Hain
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Alberto Escudero-Pascual
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, JJ Behrens
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Tony Hain
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Tony Hain
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Alberto Escudero-Pascual
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Pekka Nikander
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Tony Hain
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Jari Arkko
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Tony Hain
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, gabriel montenegro
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Tony Hain
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Jari Arkko
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, gabriel montenegro
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Brian E Carpenter
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Pekka Nikander
  • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, john . loughney
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Jari Arkko
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Pekka Nikander
  • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
  • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, Keith Moore
      • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Pekka Nikander
      • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, Keith Moore
      • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, Keith Moore
      • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, Keith Moore
      • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, gabriel montenegro
      • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, James Kempf
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, Robert Elz
  • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Erik Nordmark
• ipng list problems, Bob Hinden
• Draft IPv6 working group meeting minutes, Bob Hinden
  • Re: Draft IPv6 working group meeting minutes, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Draft IPv6 working group meeting minutes, Glenn Morrow
• ICMP protocol filtering, David Lehmann
  • Re: ICMP protocol filtering, Vladislav Yasevich
    • Re: ICMP protocol filtering, David Lehmann
  • Re: ICMP protocol filtering, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: ICMP protocol filtering, Markku Savela
      • Re: ICMP protocol filtering, David Lehmann
    • Re: ICMP protocol filtering, David Lehmann
      • Re: ICMP protocol filtering, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: ICMP protocol filtering, David Lehmann
      • Re: ICMP protocol filtering, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• deprecated addrs in src addr selection question, Sebastien Roy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: deprecated addrs in src addr selection question, Richard Draves
• Security Multicast In IPv6 visit IPv4, jpxiong
• IPv6 address, user user
• ICANN Considered Harmful, george+ipng
• RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
  • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Brian E Carpenter
    • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Rami Lehtonen
      • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Jari Arkko
    • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Erik Nordmark
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
  • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Erik Nordmark
• RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, john . loughney
  • Re: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, Jari Arkko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for somethingelse, john . loughney
• Stateless DNS discovery draft, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
  • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Ralph Droms
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, itojun
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Ralph Droms
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Alain Durand
  • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Rob Austein
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Aidan Williams
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Randy Bush
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Thomas Narten
  • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, itojun
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Rob Austein
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Robert Elz
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Thomas Narten
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Thomas Narten
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Rob Austein
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Thomas Narten
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Jonne . Soininen
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Rob Austein
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Yamasaki Toshi
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Thomas Narten
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Jonne . Soininen
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Rob Austein
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, john . loughney
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Yamasaki Toshi
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bill Manning
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Yamasaki Toshi
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bill Manning
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Yamasaki Toshi
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bill Manning
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, itojun
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bill Manning
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Yamasaki Toshi
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bill Manning
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bob Hinden
      • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bill Manning
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Rob Austein
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, john . loughney
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Brian Haberman
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Thomas Narten
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bill Manning
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
  • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Steve Deering
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Erik Nordmark
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bound, Jim
    • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Steve Deering
      • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Erik Nordmark
    • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Steve Deering
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bound, Jim
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bound, Jim
  • RE: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Bound, Jim
  • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Steven M. Bellovin
    • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Erik Nordmark
  • Re: Stateless DNS discovery draft, Steven M. Bellovin
    • Threat model for DNS discovery (was: Stateless DNS discovery draft), Rob Austein
      • Re: IPv6 w.g. Last Call on "Well known site local unicast addresses for DNS resolver", Rob Austein
• RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for some thing else, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
• RE: Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something else, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
• Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (aaa), Damir Bilajbegović
  • Re: Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (aaa), Francis Dupont
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (aaa), Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (aaa), Francis Dupont
  • RE: Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (aaa), Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Authentication, Authorization and Accounting (aaa), Francis Dupont
• failure of source address, Buraga, Partha S
  • Re: failure of source address, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Failure of Source Address, Buraga, Partha S
• rfc2292bis text proposal, Toerless Eckert
  • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Toerless Eckert
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Steve Deering
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Toerless Eckert
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Toerless Eckert
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Tim Hartrick
  • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Erik Nordmark
    • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Toerless Eckert
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Toerless Eckert
    • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Robert Elz
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: rfc2292bis text proposal, Toerless Eckert
• Using "a bit" as a protection against bidding down / for something, JJ Behrens
• forward progress reg, Arun
• Forward Progress Reg:, Arun Jose
  • Re: Forward Progress Reg:, Margaret Wasserman
    • Re: Forward Progress Reg:, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• raw ipv6 sockets - sin6_scope_id, user user
• Global IPv6 Summit in Beijing , China on 9-11 May, Hua Ning
  • Re: (ngtrans) Global IPv6 Summit in Beijing , China on 9-11 May, itojun
    • Re: (ngtrans) Global IPv6 Summit in Beijing , China on 9-11 May, Hua Ning
• Listen sockets and scoped addressing?, Markku Savela
  • Re: Listen sockets and scoped addressing?, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Listen sockets and scoped addressing?, Tim Hartrick
• Flow label in IPv6 header., user user
• Prefix delegation discussion, Nathan Lutchansky
• Updated "IPv6 for Second and Third Generation Cellular Hosts" draft, john . loughney
• IPv6 http://playground.sun.com/ is down, itojun
• Data corruption, user user
• Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bob Hinden
  • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Randy Bush
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bill Sommerfeld
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bill Manning
  • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Keith Moore
  • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
  • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Thomas Narten
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bob Hinden
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bob Hinden
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bob Hinden
  • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Ralph Droms
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Ralph Droms
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Keith Moore
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Ralph Droms
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Keith Moore
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Ralph Droms
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Keith Moore
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bob Hinden
  • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Robert Elz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Jonne . Soininen
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, john . loughney
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Ole Troan
    • Why fragmentation is prevented at intermediate routers in IPv6?, Srinivasa Rao Nalluri
      • Re: Why fragmentation is prevented at intermediate routers in IPv6?, itojun
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Markku Savela
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, john . loughney
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE
  • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bob Hinden
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Thomas Narten
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bob Hinden
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bound, Jim
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Randy Bush
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
    • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Randy Bush
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Steve Deering
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Ralph Droms
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Ralph Droms
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Steve Deering
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Brian Haberman
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Randy Bush
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, itojun
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Randy Bush
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Brian Haberman
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Randy Bush
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bob Hinden
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, itojun
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Mark . Andrews
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bob Hinden
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bob Hinden
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Steve Deering
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Ralph Droms
      • Question on RFC-2472: IPv6 over PPP, Anil Kumar Reddy
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Steve Deering
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Robert Elz
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Robert Elz
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Robert Elz
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, itojun
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, itojun
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Randy Bush
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Hesham Soliman (ERA)
    • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Ralph Droms
      • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Brian Haberman
    • Re: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Rob Austein
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, Bound, Jim
  • RE: Proposed IPv6 DNS Discovery Requirements, BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE
• sockaddr_in6::sin6_scope_id use, Edward Boden
  • Re: sockaddr_in6::sin6_scope_id use, Markku Savela
    • Re: sockaddr_in6::sin6_scope_id use, Francis Dupont
      • Re: sockaddr_in6::sin6_scope_id use, Markku Savela
      • Re: sockaddr_in6::sin6_scope_id use, Markku Savela
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: sockaddr_in6::sin6_scope_id use, Jack McCann
• ICMPv6 too big with a "too small" MTU, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: ICMPv6 too big with a "too small" MTU, Rob Austein
    • Re: ICMPv6 too big with a "too small" MTU, itojun
      • Re: ICMPv6 too big with a "too small" MTU, Rob Austein
  • Re: ICMPv6 too big with a "too small" MTU, Steve Deering
    • Re: ICMPv6 too big with a "too small" MTU, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ICMPv6 too big with a "too small" MTU, Richard Draves
• new rfc2292bis draft, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: new rfc2292bis draft, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: new rfc2292bis draft, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: new rfc2292bis draft, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: new rfc2292bis draft, Thomas Narten
• scoping-arch and link-local addresses in RH, Pekka Savola
  • Re: scoping-arch and link-local addresses in RH, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉