IPNG thread archive

• Date Index

• Re: A simple question, (continued)
  • Re: A simple question, Markku Savela
  • Re: A simple question, Michael Thomas
  • Re: A simple question, Randall Stewart
  • Re: A simple question, Markku Savela
  • Re: A simple question, Richard Carlson
  • Re: A simple question, Randall Stewart
  • Re: A simple question, Robert Elz
  • Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A simple question, Margaret Wasserman
  • Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A simple question, Eliot Lear
  • Re: A simple question, Michael Thomas
  • Re: A simple question, Matt Crawford
  • Re: A simple question, Mark . Andrews
  • Re: A simple question, Robert Elz
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Ole Troan
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Ole Troan
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
  • Re: A simple question, Richard Carlson
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
  • Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
  • Message not available
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Brian Haberman
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Ignatios Souvatzis
  • Re: A simple question, Robert Elz
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Robert Elz
  • Message not available
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Message not available
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Leif Johansson
  • Re: A simple question, Margaret Wasserman
  • Message not available
  • Re: A simple question, Robert Elz
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Margaret Wasserman
  • Re: A simple question, David Conrad
  • Re: A simple question, Bill Manning
  • Message not available
  • Re: IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A simple question, Robert Elz
  • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Andrew White
  • Re: A simple question, Bill Manning
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: A simple question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A simple question, Bill Manning
    • Re: A simple question, Pekka Savola
      • Re: A simple question, Bill Manning
  • RE: A simple question, john . loughney
    • Re: A simple question, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A simple question, Matt Crawford
• Re: Availability of recorded IETF 56 sessions..., Tim Chown
• ISP using dynamic address/prefix, Pekka Savola
• why I voted for deprecation [hijacking prefixes for disconnected], Pekka Savola
• IPv6 Address validation, Ravi Kumar M
  • Re: IPv6 Address validation, S Ramesh
    • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Shannon -jj Behrens
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Mark . Andrews
      • RE: IPv6 Address validation, Vijayabhaskar A K
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Bill Manning
      • RE: IPv6 Address validation, Vijayabhaskar A K
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Bill Manning
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, itojun
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, EricLKlein
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Ramanan
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Shannon -jj Behrens
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Bob Hinden
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Mark . Andrews
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, itojun
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Nir Arad
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Dean Strik
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, O.L.N.Rao
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, O.L.N.Rao
      • doubt in IPv6 Default address selection, Jayabharathi
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, itojun
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Shannon -jj Behrens
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Robert Elz
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, itojun
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Mark . Andrews
      • Re: IPv6 Address validation, Robert Elz
• RE: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Tony Hain
  • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore
    • RE: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Tony Hain
      • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore
    • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore
      • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore
      • Message not available
      • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore
      • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Robert Elz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Tony Hain
    • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Eliot Lear
      • RE: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Tony Hain
      • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore
    • Re: Architectural Considerations section in specs, Keith Moore
• RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain
  • Re: A follow up question, David Conrad
  • Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
    • RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain
      • Re: A follow up question, Shannon -jj Behrens
      • RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain
      • Re: A follow up question, Shannon -jj Behrens
      • RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain
      • Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
      • Message not available
      • Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
    • Re: A follow up question, Stephen Sprunk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain
    • Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
      • RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain
      • Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
      • Message not available
      • TCPng/ multiple addresses per node (was Re: A follow up question)_, Alain Durand
    • Re: A follow up question, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
  • RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain
    • Re: A follow up question, Eliot Lear
      • RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain
      • Re: A follow up question, Eliot Lear
      • Re: A follow up question, Tim Chown
      • Re: A follow up question, Ronald van der Pol
      • Re: A follow up question, Tim Chown
      • WG Chair in the House? (Re: A follow up question), Margaret Wasserman
    • Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
      • RE: A follow up question, Tony Hain
      • Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
  • Re: A follow up question, Keith Moore
  • RE: A follow up question, john . loughney
• Path MTU discovery and IPv6-in-IPv4 tunnels, Fred L. Templin
• list (sort of) fixed, matthew . ford
• a trivial answer, Quality Quorum
• RE: TCPng/ multiple addresses per node (was Re: A follow up question)_, john.loughney
  • Re: TCPng/ multiple addresses per node (was Re: A follow up question)_, Alain Durand
    • Re: TCPng/ multiple addresses per node (was Re: A follow up question)_, Brian E Carpenter
• Appeal clarification ..., Tony Hain
• I never thought about hijacking an IPv4 /8, Michel Py
  • RE: I never thought about hijacking an IPv4 /8, Jeroen Massar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: I never thought about hijacking an IPv4 /8, Michel Py
    • RE: I never thought about hijacking an IPv4 /8, Jeroen Massar
• My thoughts on local-use addresses, Jason Hunt
  • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Jason Hunt
    • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Keith Moore
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Jason Hunt
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Keith Moore
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Arien Vijn
      • RE: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Mario Goebbels
      • RE: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Pekka Savola
      • RE: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Mario Goebbels
      • RE: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Pekka Savola
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Robert Elz
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Pekka Savola
      • Message not available
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Keith Moore
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Michael Thomas
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Keith Moore
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Michael Thomas
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Keith Moore
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: My thoughts on local-use addresses, Hesham Soliman
• Router Lifetime question, Peter Barany
  • Re: Router Lifetime question, Erik Nordmark
    • Re: Router Lifetime question, Siva Veerepalli
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Router Lifetime question, Peter Barany
    • RE: Router Lifetime question, Erik Nordmark
  • RE: Router Lifetime question, Peter Barany
• prefix delegation service, Shannon -jj Behrens
  • Re: prefix delegation service, Shannon -jj Behrens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: prefix delegation service, Dan Lanciani
    • Re: prefix delegation service, Brian McGehee
• RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Margaret Wasserman
  • RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Tony Hain
  • RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Tony Hain
• RFC 3531 on A Flexible Method for Managing the Assignment of Bits of an IPv6 Address Block, rfc-editor
• new dmca laws and rfc 3041, Renee Danson
  • RE: new dmca laws and rfc 3041, Tony Hain
    • Re: new dmca laws and rfc 3041, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: new dmca laws and rfc 3041, Scott Bradner
    • Re: new dmca laws and rfc 3041, Francis Dupont
• Question about RFC 3306, Mario Goebbels
  • Re: Question about RFC 3306, Brian Haberman
• Re: policy domains, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: policy domains, Eliot Lear
• Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Quality Quorum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Keith Moore
    • Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Michael Thomas
      • Re: A Good Schism Brightens Anyone's Day (was: A Simple Question), Keith Moore
• Re: IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), J. Noel Chiappa
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: IPv6 address space shortages (was: Re: A simple question), Tony Hain
• May one configure IID= "0" for an address ?, Robert . Peschi
  • Re: May one configure IID= "0" for an address ?, Bob Hinden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: May one configure IID= "0" for an address ?, Robert . Peschi
• RFID in V6?, George Michaelson
  • RE: RFID in V6?, Subrata Goswami
    • RE: RFID in V6?, Soohong Daniel Park
      • RE: RFID in V6?, Subrata Goswami
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • re: RFID in V6?, Jun Murai
    • Re: RFID in V6?, George Michaelson
      • Re: RFID in V6?, itojun
• Stateless DHCPv6 == "Other stateful configuration"?, Ralph Droms
• Request to Advance "IPv6 Flow Label Specification", Bob Hinden
• My point about the ambiguity of the question, Tony Hain
  • Re: My point about the ambiguity of the question, Keith Moore
    • RE: My point about the ambiguity of the question, Tony Hain
      • Re: My point about the ambiguity of the question, Keith Moore
      • RE: My point about the ambiguity of the question, Tony Hain
      • Re: My point about the ambiguity of the question, Keith Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: My point about the ambiguity of the question, Bound, Jim
• RFC 3316 on Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) for Some Second and Third Generation Cellular Hosts, rfc-editor
• Re: site-local != NAT, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: site-local != NAT, Keith Moore
• Re: what the "scope" disagreement is about, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: what the "scope" disagreement is about, Keith Moore
• RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Bound, Jim
  • RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Tony Hain
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Bound, Jim
  • RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michel Py
    • RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Pekka Savola
    • RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michael Thomas
  • RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Bound, Jim
    • Re: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Bhaskar S
      • Re: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Margaret Wasserman
      • Re: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Michael Thomas
      • Re: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Bhaskar S
      • Re: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Margaret Wasserman
  • RE: Your Appeal Regarding Site-Local Deprecation (Was: Consensus on Site-Local Addressing), Bound, Jim
• I-D ACTION:draft-desanti-ipv6-over-fibre-channel-01.txt, Claudio DeSanti
• test - please ignore, Nico Bayer
• Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
  • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Pekka Savola
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
  • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Bob Hinden
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Greg Daley
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Francis Dupont
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Charles E. Perkins
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Pekka Savola
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Vijay Devarapalli
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Pekka Savola
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Charles E. Perkins
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Mika Liljeberg
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Mika Liljeberg
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Youn-Hee Han
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Mika Liljeberg
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, john . loughney
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Bound, Jim
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Charlie Perkins
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Hesham Soliman
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Vladislav Yasevich
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Hesham Soliman
  • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Hesham Soliman
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Hesham Soliman
    • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Mika Liljeberg
  • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Robert . Peschi
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Francis Dupont
  • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Robert . Peschi
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, john . loughney
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Francis Dupont
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, john.loughney
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Francis Dupont
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Bound, Jim
    • Summary: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
      • Re: Summary: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Charles E. Perkins
      • Re: Summary: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Mika Liljeberg
      • Re: Summary: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Charles E. Perkins
      • Re: Summary: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Mika Liljeberg
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Bound, Jim
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Bound, Jim
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Bound, Jim
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Greg Daley
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Youn-Hee Han
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Bound, Jim
    • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Greg Daley
  • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Hesham Soliman
    • RE: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Mika Liljeberg
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Charles E. Perkins
      • Re: Avoiding interface failure upon DAD failure, Jari Arkko
• Internetworking 2003: Call for Participation, CAITR
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Internetworking 2003: Call for Participation, CAITR