IPNG thread archive

• Date Index

• Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, (continued)
  • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Ole Troan
    • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Jeroen Massar
    • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Fred Templin
    • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
  • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Soliman Hesham
    • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Brian Haberman
  • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Soliman Hesham
    • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
  • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Christian Huitema
    • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Jari Arkko
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Fred Templin
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Ralph Droms
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Fred Templin
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Ralph Droms
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Fred Templin
  • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
  • RE: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Soliman Hesham
  • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
    • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Ralph Droms
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Pekka Savola
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: ND-proxy applicability and loop-prevention, Ole Troan
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-prefix-delegation-requirement-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-prefix-delegation-requirement-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Deletion of auto configured link local address, Suvendu M
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Deletion of auto configured link local address, Suresh Krishnan
• Deletion of auto configured link local address], Bhaskar S
• Re: [ppml] Re: ASN-based prefixes for leaf ASes, Michael . Dillon
• Protocol Action: 'Management Information Base for the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-00.txt, Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
• IPv6 w.g. minutes from the Seoul IETF, Bob Hinden
• IP MIB issues, shawn . routhier
  • Re: IP MIB issues, Brian Haberman
• Is there any router vendors supporting IPv6 Jumbogram?, knowme
• draft-ietf-ipv6-deprecate-site-local-03.txt, Christian Huitema
• Free Random Numbers, george+ipng
• Additional Note, george+ipng
• Question about the Site-local Unicast Address in IPv6, lidefeng
  • Re: Question about the Site-local Unicast Address in IPv6, Brian Haberman
  • Re: Question about the Site-local Unicast Address in IPv6, Felipe Alfaro Solana
    • Re: Question about the Site-local Unicast Address in IPv6, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question about the Site-local Unicast Address in IPv6, Suresh Krishnan
• RE: [ipv6mib] IP MIB issues, Dave Thaler
• Document Action: 'Requirements for IPv6 prefix delegation' to Informational RFC, The IESG
• Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Brian Haberman
  • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Brian E Carpenter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Brian Haberman
  • RE: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Pekka Savola
    • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Bill Manning
  • RE: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Dan Lanciani
    • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
      • Re: Response to AD comments ondraft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Mark Smith
      • Message not available
      • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Brian E Carpenter
      • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Bob Hinden
      • Re: Response to AD comments ondraft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Hans Kruse
  • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Dan Lanciani
    • RE: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Tony Hain
      • RE: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Pekka Savola
      • RE: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Tony Hain
      • RE: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Pekka Savola
      • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • RE: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Tony Hain
      • Re: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • RE: Response to AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-03.txt, Dan Lanciani
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2011-update-08.txt, Internet-Drafts
• Revising PMTUD for IPv6 to DS?, Pekka Savola
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Revising PMTUD for IPv6 to DS?, Jack McCann USG
    • Re: Revising PMTUD for IPv6 to DS?, Bob Hinden
• [psg.com #271] Using stable storage for autoconfigured addresses, rt+ipv6-2462bis
• routing problems in IPv6, Boodhoo Avinash
• A small clarification required, Jayabharathi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: A small clarification required, Soliman Hesham
  • RE: A small clarification required, john . loughney
• [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Ralph Droms
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Ralph Droms
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Ralph Droms
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Fred Templin
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Ralph Droms
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Alain Durand
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, S. Daniel Park
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, john . loughney
    • RE: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Bernie Volz
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Christian Huitema
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Alain Durand
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, Soliman Hesham
• Re :[rfc2462bis] what is the stateful configuration protocol, PARK SOO HONG
• RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery, Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery, Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai
    • Re: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • RE: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery, Soliman Hesham
  • RE: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery, Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai
  • RE: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery, Soliman Hesham
  • RE: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery, Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai
    • Re: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery, Markus Jork
      • Re: RFC 2461 : Neighbor Discovery, Iljitsch van Beijnum
• [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Ralph Droms
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
      • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Russell Brian
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Markku Savela
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Ralph Droms
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Tim Chown
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • M/O flags: hints vs more [Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re:[rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags)], Pekka Savola
      • Re: M/O flags: hints vs more [Re: the protocols for the M/O flags(Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags)], Christian Strauf (JOIN)
      • Re: M/O flags: hints vs more [Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags)], Tim Chown
      • Re: M/O flags: hints vs more [Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re:[rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags)], Alain Durand
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Ralph Droms
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether weneed the M/O flags), Christian Strauf (JOIN)
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether weneed the M/O flags), Christian Strauf (JOIN)
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • the protocol for the O flag, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: the protocol for the O flag, Ralph Droms
      • Re: the protocol for the O flag, Stig Venaas
      • Re: the protocol for the O flag, Christian Strauf
      • Re: the protocol for the O flag, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: the protocol for the O flag, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Iljitsch van Beijnum
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
      • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, S. Daniel Park
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Iljitsch van Beijnum
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Tim Chown
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, john . loughney
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Vijayabhaskar A K
  • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Tim Hartrick
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Tim Hartrick
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Soliman Hesham
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Soliman Hesham
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, john . loughney
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Soliman Hesham
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Christian Huitema
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Brian Haberman
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Brian Haberman
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Brian Haberman
    • Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-06.txt, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-06.txt, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Christian Huitema
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Soliman Hesham
    • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Bernie Volz
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Alain Durand
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Bound, Jim
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Tim Chown
  • RE: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags, Bound, Jim
• RFC 2385 on IPv6, Jeroen Massar
  • Re: RFC 2385 on IPv6, Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RFC 2385 on IPv6, Soliman Hesham
• Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Site Local Addresses' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• question on rfc2462bis: stateful mechanisms is a MUST?, Alain Durand
  • Re: question on rfc2462bis: stateful mechanisms is a MUST?, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: question on rfc2462bis: stateful mechanisms is a MUST?, Bound, Jim
    • Re: question on rfc2462bis: stateful mechanisms is a MUST?, Alain Durand
      • Re: question on rfc2462bis: stateful mechanisms is a MUST?, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• Question about Routing Headers, Lori Napoli
  • One Question, Tarun Kr. Sharma
    • Re: One Question, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • Re: Question about Routing Headers, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Question about Routing Headers, Lori Napoli
    • Re: Fw: Question about Routing Headers, Roy Brabson
  • Re: Fw: Question about Routing Headers, Lori Napoli
    • Re: Fw: Question about Routing Headers, Brian E Carpenter
  • Re: Fw: Question about Routing Headers, Suresh Krishnan
• One Question, sharma . tarun
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: One Question, sharma . tarun
• I-D ACTION:draft-daniel-ipv6-over-wifi-00.txt, S. Daniel Park
• Routing Header scenario ......, Lori Napoli
• Small bug in the node requirements, john . loughney
• whether we need the M flag ??, Soliman Hesham
  • Re: whether we need the M flag ??, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • interop requirements for DS [Re: whether we need the M flag ??], Pekka Savola
      • Re: interop requirements for DS [Re: whether we need the M flag ??], Ralph Droms
  • Re: whether we need the M flag ??, Alain Durand
    • Re: whether we need the M flag ??, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: whether we need the M flag ??, Soliman Hesham
  • RE: whether we need the M flag ??, Soliman Hesham
• RE: interop requirements for DS [Re: whether we need the M flag ??], john . loughney
  • RE: interop requirements for DS [Re: whether we need the M flag ??], Ralph Droms
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2011-update-09.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Christian Huitema
  • RE: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Ralph Droms
    • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether weneed the M/O flags), Fred Templin
  • RE: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether weneed the M/O flags), Tim Hartrick
  • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we needthe M/O flags), Alain Durand
  • [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
    • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Tim Chown
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Tim Chown
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and relatedprotocols, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Alain Durand
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Ralph Droms
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Ralph Droms
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and relatedprotocols, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Ralph Droms
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Erik Nordmark
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Ralph Droms
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Ralph Droms
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and relatedprotocols, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related protocols, Ralph Droms
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related, Tim Chown
      • Re: [rfc2462bis] relationship between M/O flags and related, Ralph Droms
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Bound, Jim
  • RE: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Bound, Jim
    • Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2013-update-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Bound, Jim
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags), Bound, Jim
• IPV6CP - RFC Compliance 2472, Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • IPV6CP - RFC Compliance 2472, Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai
    • Re: IPV6CP - RFC Compliance 2472, Ole Troan
  • RE: IPV6CP - RFC Compliance 2472, Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai
    • RE: IPV6CP - RFC Compliance 2472, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
  • RE: IPV6CP - RFC Compliance 2472, Subramonia Pillai - CTD, Chennai
    • Re: IPV6CP - RFC Compliance 2472, Ole Troan
• RE: M/O flags: hints vs more [Re: the protocols for the M/O flags (Re: [rfc2462bis] whether we need the M/O flags)], Bound, Jim
• IPv6 Work Group Last Call: IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture, Bob Hinden
  • Re: IPv6 Work Group Last Call: IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
• routing in IPv6, spireen
• Requesting Comments & Suggestions - ID on Prefix Delegation usingICMPv6, Arun Thulasi
  • Re: Requesting Comments & Suggestions - ID on Prefix Delegationusing ICMPv6, Christian Strauf (JOIN)
  • Re: Requesting Comments & Suggestions - ID on Prefix Delegation using ICMPv6, Ralph Droms
• draft-jeong-dnsop-ipv6-dns-discovery-01.txt, Markku Savela
  • RE: draft-jeong-dnsop-ipv6-dns-discovery-01.txt, S. Daniel Park
  • Re: draft-jeong-dnsop-ipv6-dns-discovery-01.txt, Jaehoon Paul Jeong
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: draft-jeong-dnsop-ipv6-dns-discovery-01.txt, john . loughney
• I-D ACTION:draft-perlman-rbridge-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• IPv6 Work Group Last Call for "Default Router Preferences and More-Specific Routes", Bob Hinden
  • RE: IPv6 Work Group Last Call for "Default Router Preferences and More-Specific Routes", Timothy Gleeson \(tgleeson\)