[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "real" ingres implementation

To: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: "real" ingres implementation
From: Werner Almesberger <Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 01:59:20 +0100
Cc: linux-diffserv@lrc.di.epfl.ch
Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 03:24:35 +0200
Envelope-to: archive@lists.atm.tut.fi
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0011060756490.3358-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>; from hadi@cyberus.ca on Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 07:58:35AM -0500
References: <20001106095027.J3223@almesberger.net> <Pine.GSO.4.20.0011060756490.3358-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>
Sender: owner-linux-diffserv@lrc.epfl.ch

jamal wrote:
> Do we really need to make it complicated? We can imagine we never had this
> conversation, for example ;->

What conversation ? (-:C

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH           Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch /
/_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/

References:
- Re: "real" ingres implementation
  - From: Werner Almesberger
- Re: "real" ingres implementation
  - From: jamal

Prev by Date: ABE released (with EDF scheduler)
Next by Date: Q. on prio qdisc
Previous by thread: Thank you <"real" ingres implementation>
Next by thread: RE: "real" ingres implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread